AKAXAPE EDITION
ProductSecurityCompanyRequest access
The product

The analysis a deal pod runs — in one pass, with the sources attached.

Most tools give you an answer. AKAXA gives you an answer you can trace, approve, send, and still be holding two years later when the LP asks how you underwrote it.

Every number, its paperwork

A sourced number brings its filing with it.

Hover any source. It shows the document and the date the number was actually true — not “as of today,” but as of the filing it came from.

Operating metricValueAs-ofSource
Revenue YoY growth62.0%FY2025SEC XBRLForm 10-K · FY2025 · XBRL-tagged revenue, verbatim tie-out.
Gross margin67.3%2025-12-31SEC XBRLForm 10-K · balance date 2025-12-31.
EBITDA (GAAP)$78M2026-02-18SEC XBRL8-K exhibit · earnings release 2026-02-18.
Adjusted EBITDA$248M2026-02-18Unverifiable: non-GAAPStatus is a source too. Company-defined adjustment, no verbatim tie-out — flagged, not trusted.
⚠ Source gap: 10 unsourced line items held for review — Enterprise value; Entry multiple; Exit multiple; …

A quote that doesn’t tie back to the source text as a substring is not softened, not paraphrased. It’s dropped.

A ten-workstream framework

The diligence a deal pod would actually run.

Each run covers what the material supports and names the rest. Not a summary — the workstreams.

FDDFinancialCDDCommercialODDOperationalLDDLegalIPDDIntellectual propertyTDDTaxIDDInsuranceHRDDHuman capitalESGDDESGVCPValue creation plan

Plus cross-axis synthesis, a de-duplicated red-flag roll-up, sector benchmark, diligence gaps, and multiple-compression risk.

Before IC does it to you

The strongest case against your own deal.

Same evidence, skeptical priors. AKAXA argues the other side before the room does.

0 critical8 high24 open questionsDevil’s advocate — Ardeline (synthetic)
HighIntegration pace: two platform acquisitions absorbed in a single fiscal year; duplicative roles not yet quantified.
HighVendor concentration: core infrastructure providers are not disclosed across public sources.
+6more high findings · 24 open questions, each named in the scan.
One run, three files

Files you can open, argue with, and defend.

Built from one evidence layer — so the three stay consistent. Every export is stamped “review copy — verify before reliance.”

PDF

Pre-IC diligence scan

90 pages · 32 sections

Ten workstreams, red flags, valuation, Risk & SPA, 100-day plan, IC memo — and a named list of the gaps it couldn’t close.

DOCX

The scan, editable

Same content · marked up

Mark it up and take it into the room. The sources travel with it.

PPTX

IC deck

Coming soon

PowerPoint export is not available yet.

XLSX

LBO workbook

30 sheets · 392 live formulas

Sources & Uses, sensitivities, scenarios — plus Input Gaps, Source Requests, and an Audit Trail sheet.

Nothing leaves broken

Four states. What can be sent depends on which one you’re in.

Export_ready

Sourced, no missing critical field. Full export.

Validating

Coverage is thin. Exports with source-gap footnotes.

Degraded

Screening brief only. The IC memo is held back.

Blocked

A critical validation failed. The file does not render.

One evidence layer

Six seats around it.

Associate

Turns the raw data room into first-pass evidence — in one run.

VP

Pressure-tests the assumptions and organizes the workstreams.

Principal

Sharpens the thesis, the risks, and the open questions.

Partner

Reads one coherent memo and decides where to push.

Operating partner

Carries the underwriting thesis into value creation.

IR / LP

Receives an output that carries the sources behind its claims — and can’t be sent if they’re missing.

Fast is table stakes

Controlled is the moat.

ToolWhat it gives youWhat it can’t do
Generic AI chatFast answersCan’t show where the number came from
Document searchGood retrievalNo accountability for the artifact
Research agentUseful synthesisShallow on deal governance
AKAXAEvidence, memo, and a gateHolds back what it can’t stand behind
The real cost of a fragmented stack

Sixteen systems that don’t agree. Or one spine that can’t contradict itself.

The CRM says one revenue number, the model says another, the LP letter says a third. On AKAXA every workspace reads from the same evidence layer.

Source

Every live deal on one board, with its score and decision state.

Screen

First-pass scoring on evidence, not on a deck’s own claims.

Diligence

Ten workstreams; wall-crossing is a request, an approval, and a record.

Decide

One memo, sourced claims tied out; work that fails the gate can’t export.

Sign

The 100-day plan the scan produced becomes the plan you run.

Monitor

Every holding: tearsheet, financials, covenants, value-creation.

Report

LP letters from the same record the deal was underwritten on.

Exit

The deal closes; its record doesn’t. It feeds firm memory.

Nine workspaces · shown the way the product shows itself

Live surfaces, in-build surfaces — labelled, not hidden.

Deal pipeline
Deal analysis
Sourced scan, IC deck, LBO · deepest today
Firm Memory
Firm Memory
As-of history · permission-fenced · live
Funds and LPs
Funds & LPs
Commitments · calls · NAV · live
Watchfloor triage
Watchfloor
Public change, triaged · live
Portfolio monitoring
Portfolio
Tearsheets · covenants · KPIs · in build
Automations
Automations
Playbooks propose, never overwrite · in build

Shown on synthetic pilot data. Each surface states its own status inside the product — available now, not available here yet, or blocked.

What a spine actually buys you

You find out what’s missing before the partner does.

TodayThe gap surfaces in the room. Someone asks for the customer schedule, nobody has it, and the deal pauses.
On AKAXAThe scan names what it could not verify — before you present. A dedicated “Diligence Gaps” section lists it.
TodayA half-sourced deck gets emailed at 11pm because it looked done. You find out it wasn’t in the meeting.
On AKAXAIf the evidence isn’t there, the export doesn’t render. There’s no banner to scroll past.
TodayYou believe the number. You just can’t prove it in the room, and you’re not reopening the 10-K at 4pm.
On AKAXAMaterial claims keep their supporting source references; unsupported ones are flagged.
TodayThe partner asks “how many deals are live, what’s our worst covenant?” — three tools, three answers.
On AKAXAFirm-wide roll-ups: every live deal and its decision state, every covenant worst-first.
Tuesday, before and after

The same day, on a spine.

Without a spineOn the AKAXA spine
09:00Analyst rebuilds the CIM into something a partner will read.The scan came back overnight. She starts from a draft, not a blank page.
11:00VP finds three EBITDA numbers in three files and picks one.Sourced figures show the filing and page. The argument is about the deal.
16:00Someone asks whether the memo’s EBITDA matches the model.They match — built from the same evidence layer.
18:00Partner asks “is this number sourced?” Nobody is certain.The gate already refused to export the two that weren’t.
+2yLP asks how it was underwritten. The reconstruction takes a week.The scan, its sources, and its gaps are still on the record.
The thirteen contracts — honest status

What’s live, what’s in build — no asterisks.

Chained audit log · honest-gap disclosureLive on deals
Permission-scope enforcement · prose-to-source tie-out · source-tier conflict engine · license & redaction export gatesBuilt · in shadow
KPI binding · capture · detectorsBehind a flag
Bitemporal (as-of) historyBuilt · not yet on deals
See the spine under your own deal →
AKAXA · The AI-native operating system for private equity© 2026 · a Hong Kong company in formation · hello@akaxa.io
ProductSecurityCompanyRequest accessLegalPrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceData Processing AgreementSub-processorsCookie PolicyDo Not Sell My Info